|
GUN FOR YOU?
Bob's
Story | Marjorie's
Story | George's
Story
The Five Criteria Before Loading...Going
Beyond "Armed" to Safe and EffectiveToo;
Bob
Connaughy's Story
March
26, 1985, 9:30 A.M. My wife was at work and I was the only one at
home when I heard the doorbell ring. I got dressed and walked to
the kitchen window and saw a car parked across the street with two
men standing next to it, glancing about. Then they started walking
toward my house. It didn't take me long to add two and two: someone
was going to be burglarizedme
or a neighbor. I immediately called my substation and told the operator,
"I need patrol units fast."
I got out my
.45 and went to the hallway.
It seemed like
less than a minute after the doorbell rang, suddenly I heard something
hit one of the windows at the rear of the house. Then, a couple
more hits and I could hear the window break.
I'm here to
tell you, my nerves were peaked. I had never planned out in my mind
having to take a crook down inside my own home. On duty, I'd done
it many times and, like any cop, had planned it all in my mind.
Having done that for work made the initial difference for me at
home. It helped me concentrate.
A hand reached
through the broken window, opened it, and a man climbed in. The
guy went directly to our sliding glass door and let his partner
in. It was unbelievable how fast they were getting in.
My thinking
time was over. I made my move. I stepped around the corner in the
hallway, pointed my weapon at them, and shouted, "On the ground!"
The one who
had come through the window hit the floor like a pancake. The second
intruder ducked back out the sliding glass door and was gone. The
one on the floor had a twelve-inch screwdriver in his hand. Twelve
inches of stabbing toolI've seen the damage they do. "Drop
the screwdriver!" I shouted. I crouched and inched toward him. He
was still "proned out." I grabbed the screwdriver shaft in my left
hand. I didn't want to shoot him. Through the whole thing, I
didn't want to shoot him. This was a lesson I'll never forget: hesitation.
I'll never repeat that mistake.
He had a death
grip on his screwdriver. I let go and stepped back. Again I ordered
him, "Drop it!" He said, "I'm nervous. I can't." I said, "I'm a
cop, drop it or I'll shoot."
"I have three
friends outside," he said. Then, he slowly got up into a crouch.
He was damned experienced. He sensed my reluctance to shoot him.
I backed up
several feet. What am I going to do? Should I shoot him? All that
was racing through me. At this point, I had backed up maybe eight
feet into the corner, still telling him, "Drop it or I'll shoot."
Then, he made
his move. He growled and lunged at me. I blocked his first attempt
to stab me. We were inches apart. He was on me. I still didn't want
to shoot him. I moved my gun back and close to my body, trying to
keep it out of his reachtraining instincts were taking over.
Then, he brought his arm back to stab again. It raced through meyou've
had one try at me; you don't get two. I fired.
Damn, nothing
happened. I had the gun into his stomach point-blank when I pulled
the trigger. Nothing. He didn't go down. I fired again. This time
he went down hard. I backed up and turned to the sliding glass door.
I was still worried about his buddies. When I turned, he jumped
up, threw open the front door, and ran out right through the screen
door. I took off after him, but then turned back to call 911.
Later that day
units found him at the hospital with one .45 wound in his belly.
My first shot had hit his belt buckle and ricocheted off. My second
shot entered next to his belly button, went all the way through
and out his butt. And he still took off like a rabbit.
Looking back,
I gave him the advantage and an opportunity to take me out. He tried
twice. That morning changed me. Never again will I hesitate.
I also feel
more for citizens now. It was a close call. If I had not been trained
to handle an attack, I think he would have taken me out. Even with
my training, I was still nervous and tense as hell. Most citizens
would have bought it.
I had a plan,
but it was flawed. I hadn't worked out in my mind how I would handle
something like this in my OWN HOME. I knew what I wanted to
do, but I hadn't decided what I wouldn't do and wouldn't let happen.
I had not told myself, don't get close to him, don't let him back
you up, don't give him the time he needs to get to you. I had not
made the decision about when I would shoot in my own home. My strategy
is different now, I've got a new plan. Beginning with, "I won't
make it so easy to kill me. If there is a next time in my home,
when I say drop the weapon, it better happen fast."
In those final
seconds, with him inches away from me and on the attack, that's
when I was no longer thinking; the academy trainers were right.
There's no thinking and no planningyou fall back on training.
What
Bob Did Wrong
Like most police officers I've known, Bob had not made the critical
shoot/no-shoot decision against an intruder in his own home. His
reluctance to use deadly force, especially off duty at home, is
typical of cops and costs some of them their lives.
What
Bob Did Right
Although a cop himself, Bob first called the police, then made a
crucial mental switch from routine home activities to a survival
mind-set. At that instant, he, like everyone else, fell back on
training.
For
the Record
Bob said a citizen faced with these same circumstances would probably
have bought it." I agree.
The intruder
got five years.
Note:
In any violent attack, but especially in a home, if you're both
armed, the one who waits too long probably doesn't get a round off
or does it with a bullet already in him. I've never been around
a police officer or citizen who, after using a gun against an intruder,
didn't say, "It was the worst experience and closest call of my
life."
What if the
same attack happens to you? Escape! Get out! Your job is to protect
your family, not society. You're not trained or paid to risk bringing
in crooks. If escape is not possible, that's different. Having a
loaded gun at home has saved many lives but, unfortunately, cost
many, too.
Citizens who
are armed but not safe and also effective are the first part of
the problem. The second part of the problem are the so-called "home-defense
strategies" being promoted. Some so-called professionals advise
people on how to arm themselves and clear their home of intruders.
I've never met a sane professional who would advise anyone to clear
his home of intruders. It's what we in law enforcement used to call
the "cowboy" approach, used to describe someone who is kind of riding
in half-saddled, shooting from the hip. This is a typical example
of cowboy advice I read in a magazine: "Be careful not to expose
yourself to areas that have not been cleared. Instead, let the muzzle
of your gun precede you into the danger area." The illustration
depicts a man clearing a bedroom and then a closet. The author remarks,
"Safety resides at the end of your muzzle." That's like hoping the
gun has eyes that can see if there's anything in the closet. It's
too dangerous to deal with a possible intruder like this, and it's
a good way to have your gun taken away from you. The writer goes
on to say, "The most important thing is being prepared to shoot
all the time."
What I see building
here is tragedythe potential of accidentally shooting the
wrong person. I remember a case involving a father and a .357 magnum.
He had established safety rules for his family. He told his family
that if he screamed, "Intruder!" they were to hide so they wouldn't
distract him. He should have said, "Escape!" He also did something
excellent that few gun owners do: he never left the gun loaded in
the house when he wasn't home, but unfortunately, it wasn't enough.
One early morning,
his four-year-old son woke up and went to the bathroom. Another
rule in this family was that the children had to knock first and
announce themselves before entering their parents' bedroom. The
father had heard some noise down the hall, and when he heard the
doorknob to his bedroom being fiddled with, he grabbed his gun and
aimed at the door. The father said, "I aimed low so I wouldn't kill
the man." Unfortunately, his low shot put a bullet through his son's
upper chest and neck. His son died.
This man was
awakened from a deep sleep, was disoriented, slow to react, thickheaded.
Not the best time to grab a loaded gun and aim it at the door thinking,
"I'll blow away anyone who comes through it."
Clearing a house
of intruders is fraught with problems and danger. Problems such
as, "Do I turn on the lights, ruin my night vision, maybe expose
myself, and shoot into the dark when something moves? Or do I yell,
'I have a gun,' hoping to scare off the intruder? Or is yelling
letting him know where I am so he can shoot at me? Which room do
I check first, and how do I check it?"
When a homeowner
hears an unidentified noise in his home that gut fear tells him
might be an intruder, it's foolish for him to search his home trying
to find the noise. I've never known of any sane police officer trying
to clear a house or building of possible burglars or intruders by
himself. It doesn't matter how well you know your home. It doesn't
work in real life the way it looks on paper and in pictures. Every
house or business I've ever cleared, I cleared in the company of
other cops.
Family survival
planning should concentrate on escape, never on seeking out and
outgunning intruders. I am not against guns or gun ownership. Far
from it. To me the Second Amendment, like the "First" is very clear.
I am against using loaded home guns as the ONLY MEANS OF FAMILY
PROTECTION against intruders. Instead view your firearm as insurance
that no man blocks you or your family from escape.
Another tragic
consequence of untrained gun owners at home is that criminals often
seize the weapons and use them against the homeowner. It happens
to cops, whose greatest fear is that in a scuffle their gun might
be taken away and used against them. Cops receive training to keep
this from happening; they think about it, practice against it, and
plan against it. Yet officers are still disarmed and killed or wounded.
It almost happened to me twice, and I assure you, it happens to
citizens.
Gary Kleck,
a professor at Florida State University, wrote Point-Blank in 1991.
His groundbreaking research has startled many on both sides of the
gun debate: "In one year alone, 1980, between 1,527 and 2,819 criminals
were killed by citizens in their personal defense... while between
1967 and 1984, only twenty murderers were executed after conviction
for killing citizens. . . Violence-prone intruders realize that
death is more likely to come from armed homeowners than the criminal
justice system."
Sociologists
James Wright and Peter Rossi, both regularly quoted in criminal-violence
research programs, report, "Three-fifths of all felons interviewed
said they are more worried over running into armed citizens than
running into the police."
The Department
of Justice Uniform Crime Reports and National Crime Victimization
survey show that "guns are used about as often for defensive purposes
as criminal purposes."
According to
Professor Kleck, there were "691,000 defensive gun uses in America
between 1985 and 1990."
For
More: At Home
|